Scene one
Student are waiting in front of there class’s to go in with the new cloths on and you can see it on there face’s that there so excited for the new year. The class starts so they go in the classroom. And the teacher starts taking about what there going to do on this semester and a normal class period goes on.
Scene two
Students go from there first class to there second class and where there is a new teacher is going to teach them that subject, they go in and the teacher introduce her self to the class and tells them what there doing this semester and her techniques in teaching this certain subject.
Scene three
The new teacher thinks that she got the class under control based on there behavior on the first day. But the second day when the teacher started teaching, side conversation goes on and students not behave anymore, she tries to get the class under control but it doesn’t work with her.
Scene four
It shows the new teacher asking other teachers in the school how she could relate more with students or connect more with them and what can brings there attention to her, and other teachers tells her to try and talk about grades and how if they don’t listen to her they wont graduate and another trick was to bring candy and who ever answer her questions right, she gives him a piece of candy.
And she tries those tricks and it becomes that the candy trick works better with the students, but they are still not like how the teacher wants them to be in class.
Scene five
This scene should focus on students more than teachers so we can see how the students feels, and there will be love going on or crushes between student in class that causes fight. I think the crushes and love and fighting between student, makes the film more interesting to watch.
Scene six.
In this scene a guy comes from outside the school and see how the school is running and how’s the new teacher doing
Scene seven
The students start to like the teacher with the time and everything goes well and that would be the ending.
Monday, April 12, 2010
Tuesday, April 6, 2010
H.W #47
-1 Students are un-behaving in class in the beginning!
-2 There should be a class punk!
-3 There is a class leader or student leader!
-4 Teacher tries to be tough in the beginning but it doesn’t work and they try to get closer to the class leader as another choice and then it works.
-5 There should be comedy going on so it be nice to watch.
-6 Students in the end start to behave and they start to study and do homework which they didn’t from before!
-2 There should be a class punk!
-3 There is a class leader or student leader!
-4 Teacher tries to be tough in the beginning but it doesn’t work and they try to get closer to the class leader as another choice and then it works.
-5 There should be comedy going on so it be nice to watch.
-6 Students in the end start to behave and they start to study and do homework which they didn’t from before!
Monday, April 5, 2010
H.W #46
The chocolate war by Robert Cormier is talking about a boy name jerry Renault who goes to a same sex school, and that school has a gang that named the vigils and that lead by Archie Costello, Archie gives homework assignments to boys in the school and Jerrys homework assignment was to sell a number of chocolate box’s , the gang decided to stop Jerry’s assignment, but he refused and they decided to make his life terrible , they did many terrible stuff to him, like calling his house and getting rid of his homework and even beating him up…
In chapter 7 it shows that Emile Janza is the school thug., Janza a proud trouble maker, sits in the front of classrooms instead of the back, always messing with people asking for trouble, largely because he knows most people to avoid it.
I connect this to my topic(comparing same sex school to mix school) on how boys act in same sex school and mix school as thugs.
From my own experience I saw that in same sex all what boys care about is who’s the tougher than the other since there is no girls in the same class to pay more attention to them more than being tough on my friends and being able to beat everyone or hanging out with the toughest guys.
But in mix school boys care about being around the cutest girls or having the cutest girlfriend in the school more than being tough on kids from my school(thinking of the other sex ”girls” makes the boys not think of being tough or beating up other students) . There is probably some guys like that in mix school but not as much as same sex school.
In chapter 7 it shows that Emile Janza is the school thug., Janza a proud trouble maker, sits in the front of classrooms instead of the back, always messing with people asking for trouble, largely because he knows most people to avoid it.
I connect this to my topic(comparing same sex school to mix school) on how boys act in same sex school and mix school as thugs.
From my own experience I saw that in same sex all what boys care about is who’s the tougher than the other since there is no girls in the same class to pay more attention to them more than being tough on my friends and being able to beat everyone or hanging out with the toughest guys.
But in mix school boys care about being around the cutest girls or having the cutest girlfriend in the school more than being tough on kids from my school(thinking of the other sex ”girls” makes the boys not think of being tough or beating up other students) . There is probably some guys like that in mix school but not as much as same sex school.
Monday, March 22, 2010
H.W #45
Both agreed that testing results reflect reading levels in elementary grades, but Sizer questioned further uses of tests. Telling reporters that they haven't asked what tests suggest about students, he gave his strong opinion: "They correlate with rich parents and not much else. We have to stop equating serious education with test scores."
These are 2 different theories about school one (Sizer) that is teaching you how to think better and ask good questions, the other (Hirsch) is asking to memorize stuff! In my own experience I wont through both of these theories since I went to 2 different school during high school, and I think both of them has some good stuff and some bad stuff, the good think about memorizing stuff is you know a lot of information in your head that is important, as Hirsch says "Students should be able to read and know basic number facts by the end of the first grade". But the bad think is that it doesn’t teach how to think of things better and develop new ideas which is important!
The other theory (Sizer) helps me to think better and ask better question. And its good because it helps you to think better of everything. But the thing that I don’t like that its more focusing on teaching on how you need to think and it doesn’t give you this much of information of stuff around the world.
But if I was to pick which one is better.I think Sizer is better because in my own experience, when I first got here to America coming from school that teaches Hirsch’s way and went to a school that teach in a Sizer way, the school in the U.S (Sizer way) helped me to learn English in a year because its talking and thinking. As Sizer states, “Inspiration, hunger: these are the qualities that drive good schools. The best we educational planners can do is to create the most likely conditions for them to flourish, and then get out of their way.” This is why I was able to develop the language faster more than if it was focusing on memorizing stuff.
These are 2 different theories about school one (Sizer) that is teaching you how to think better and ask good questions, the other (Hirsch) is asking to memorize stuff! In my own experience I wont through both of these theories since I went to 2 different school during high school, and I think both of them has some good stuff and some bad stuff, the good think about memorizing stuff is you know a lot of information in your head that is important, as Hirsch says "Students should be able to read and know basic number facts by the end of the first grade". But the bad think is that it doesn’t teach how to think of things better and develop new ideas which is important!
The other theory (Sizer) helps me to think better and ask better question. And its good because it helps you to think better of everything. But the thing that I don’t like that its more focusing on teaching on how you need to think and it doesn’t give you this much of information of stuff around the world.
But if I was to pick which one is better.I think Sizer is better because in my own experience, when I first got here to America coming from school that teaches Hirsch’s way and went to a school that teach in a Sizer way, the school in the U.S (Sizer way) helped me to learn English in a year because its talking and thinking. As Sizer states, “Inspiration, hunger: these are the qualities that drive good schools. The best we educational planners can do is to create the most likely conditions for them to flourish, and then get out of their way.” This is why I was able to develop the language faster more than if it was focusing on memorizing stuff.
H.W # 44
in Obamas article its saying that school is to give students education and help them to understand stuff better and get them ready for college! and that everyone should work hard because there having all the money and stuff and that he didnt get and of those when he was a student and that his mom used to wake him up early to teach him showing that he worked so hard!
in the other article they didnt focus on what school for or anything they basically were talking about teachers and how they sould love there jobs because there teaching kids and developing new thoughts ad new future!
in my p.o.v i think that we need to work hard because student in the U.S have all the resources and they should take advantage of that to succeed because other student in other countries are not having what student in the U.S students having and there doing better in some areas! what i think school for, is to give us the education and let us know what going around in the world so we understand everything and that we can think of new stuff so in the future we can develop new stuff that effects better on the world!
in the other article they didnt focus on what school for or anything they basically were talking about teachers and how they sould love there jobs because there teaching kids and developing new thoughts ad new future!
in my p.o.v i think that we need to work hard because student in the U.S have all the resources and they should take advantage of that to succeed because other student in other countries are not having what student in the U.S students having and there doing better in some areas! what i think school for, is to give us the education and let us know what going around in the world so we understand everything and that we can think of new stuff so in the future we can develop new stuff that effects better on the world!
Monday, March 1, 2010
H.W #42
PART A
n this web site it says that “the study’s says says that single sex school doesn’t really matter on the pupils exam results, but it also says in single class school girls do better in chemistry and physics while boys do better in A English and male-dominated subjects”
This site also says that some parents prefer there daughters to be in single sex school because they think that when boys are not in class girls pay attention more and do better! But the number of girls that do better is higher than boys even in mixed school!
http://www.literacytrust.org.uk/Research/ressinglesex.html
this site is saying ” that single sex class may have positive effects on girls” so its agree-ing that single sex class room are better for girls! In my point f view boys most of the time be trying to act like there 2 cool to do homework so they don’t do good even if there is no girls in class!
http://www.jstor.org/pss/1501861
part-b
Do boys/girls do better in single sex school or mixed schools?
I wanted to write about this topic (how single sex classroom are better) because I used to go to a single sex middle school and 2 years for high school, then in my third year of high school I moved to the .U.S and went to a mixed high school.
So I had some experiences about it and how it feels and if its better single sex school or mixed?!
this question is important for people to know because if it does really make a diffrent for student when it be single sex in class rooms and on there grades! then we would make more single sex school to make student gets better and think better and this way we have a better future for evryone!but if it doesnt really matter then we wont be worried if we have mixed schools!
n this web site it says that “the study’s says says that single sex school doesn’t really matter on the pupils exam results, but it also says in single class school girls do better in chemistry and physics while boys do better in A English and male-dominated subjects”
This site also says that some parents prefer there daughters to be in single sex school because they think that when boys are not in class girls pay attention more and do better! But the number of girls that do better is higher than boys even in mixed school!
http://www.literacytrust.org.uk/Research/ressinglesex.html
this site is saying ” that single sex class may have positive effects on girls” so its agree-ing that single sex class room are better for girls! In my point f view boys most of the time be trying to act like there 2 cool to do homework so they don’t do good even if there is no girls in class!
http://www.jstor.org/pss/1501861
part-b
Do boys/girls do better in single sex school or mixed schools?
I wanted to write about this topic (how single sex classroom are better) because I used to go to a single sex middle school and 2 years for high school, then in my third year of high school I moved to the .U.S and went to a mixed high school.
So I had some experiences about it and how it feels and if its better single sex school or mixed?!
this question is important for people to know because if it does really make a diffrent for student when it be single sex in class rooms and on there grades! then we would make more single sex school to make student gets better and think better and this way we have a better future for evryone!but if it doesnt really matter then we wont be worried if we have mixed schools!
h.w # 41
in this web cite, its telling us that single sex class’s are better than mix ones because they be mixed girls are not assertive about there education if boys are in class room! And that teacher give more time for boys to answer a question more than they give to girls!
This quote on the cite shows the most of what I am talking about!
“Research has shown for a long time that girls are not assertive about their education if boys are in the classroom. Girls also receive less attention from teachers. Studies have shown that teachers wait longer for boys to give an answer than girls.”
http://educationalissues.suite101.com/article.cfm/single_sex_classrooms
-----------------------------------------------------
this cite tells us that when the class be mixed (boys, girls) each sex be shy in front of the other on doing some stuff in class, and boys behavior be different when girls be around, so its basically not agreeing on having kids of different sex in the same class!
http://www.springerlink.com/content/vp6k47wt30502030/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Single sex classrooms effects better on both (boy, girls), and it also says that girls are more successful than boys in school and state of South Carolina is determined to offer a single-sex classroom experience to all middle school students within the next few years.
And I like those points they have on the cite
Whats good about single sex classrooms
* Teachers can spend extra time with topics that boys or girls may struggle with.
* Classes can be differentiated by gender.
* Students may branch out and try new things without the other gender to impress.
* Discipline problems decrease
* Academic achievement increases
* It is inexpensive. Separating the two genders does not require changing walls or hiring more teachers.
What’s not good about single sex classrooms!
* Social skills between genders get put on hold.
* Not all studies show academic improvement.
* Some feel it is discrimination. The ACLU believes that boys do not learn differently than girls and can lead to unequal education.
* This theory has not stood the test of time.
And as we can see the good stuff are more than the bad ones! S I guess single sex classrooms are better than mixed ones!
http://educationalissues.suite101.com/article.cfm/pros_and_cons_of_samesex_classrooms
This quote on the cite shows the most of what I am talking about!
“Research has shown for a long time that girls are not assertive about their education if boys are in the classroom. Girls also receive less attention from teachers. Studies have shown that teachers wait longer for boys to give an answer than girls.”
http://educationalissues.suite101.com/article.cfm/single_sex_classrooms
-----------------------------------------------------
this cite tells us that when the class be mixed (boys, girls) each sex be shy in front of the other on doing some stuff in class, and boys behavior be different when girls be around, so its basically not agreeing on having kids of different sex in the same class!
http://www.springerlink.com/content/vp6k47wt30502030/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Single sex classrooms effects better on both (boy, girls), and it also says that girls are more successful than boys in school and state of South Carolina is determined to offer a single-sex classroom experience to all middle school students within the next few years.
And I like those points they have on the cite
Whats good about single sex classrooms
* Teachers can spend extra time with topics that boys or girls may struggle with.
* Classes can be differentiated by gender.
* Students may branch out and try new things without the other gender to impress.
* Discipline problems decrease
* Academic achievement increases
* It is inexpensive. Separating the two genders does not require changing walls or hiring more teachers.
What’s not good about single sex classrooms!
* Social skills between genders get put on hold.
* Not all studies show academic improvement.
* Some feel it is discrimination. The ACLU believes that boys do not learn differently than girls and can lead to unequal education.
* This theory has not stood the test of time.
And as we can see the good stuff are more than the bad ones! S I guess single sex classrooms are better than mixed ones!
http://educationalissues.suite101.com/article.cfm/pros_and_cons_of_samesex_classrooms
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)